Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
66.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.57 out of 10
Ergonomics6.12 out of 10
Gear ratio4.4:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight265g / 9.35oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €399.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000PGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
