Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (79 centimeter / 31.1 inch). Still, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.5 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.1:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD
