Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
75.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €132.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XGD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X edges out Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (4.7:1) and the total score (9.5 out of 10). Still, Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.5 out of 10 and a line retrieve per crank of 94 centimeter / 37.01 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin IXTREK 5000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX
