Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Cardiff 201A
Multireels
35.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size201
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/315. 0.25/255, 0.30/195 lb-yds: 8/230, 10/210, 14/120
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 201A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 201A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Cardiff 201A?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Cardiff 401A


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tiagra 50AX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50AX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Cardiff 401A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX
