Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Cardiff 301A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Cardiff 301A
Multireels
34.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02 lbs
Weight252g / 8.89oz
Line retireve per crank61cm / 24.01 inch
Ball bearings4 A-RB + 1 RB
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €88.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size301
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/285. 0.30/235, 0.40/40 lb/yds:12/230, 14/180
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Shimano Cardiff 301A, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Cardiff 301A may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Cardiff 301A?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX
