Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
Similar comparisons
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX
Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
Shimano Twin Power FD C3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Delphin RAYA body
Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX