Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
87.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €163.20
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X offers a line retrieve per crank of 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch, while Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX stands out for a weight of 195g / 6,88oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX
- With a score like 8.7 out of 10 (195g / 6,88oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sienna 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
