Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X stands out for a weight of 160g / 5,64oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 SFI


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 6500X vs Shimano Aero 4000X
