Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD, 4012, left and right hand, Match and Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10215-412
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €199.00
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4012
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa Fuego LT, 3000D-C, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, front drag, 10225-305
Daiwa Fuego LT
Spinning
3000d-cx
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €77.80
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000D-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX, offering significantly better performance in durability (5.5 out of 10) and total score (9.11 out of 10). While Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa Fuego LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables