Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight2040g / 71.96oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €603.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1200
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.42/1000
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X edges out Daiwa TANACOM 1200X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). Still, Daiwa TANACOM 1200X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 5.72 out of 10 and a maximum drag of 25kg / 55,12lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Similar comparisons

Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Torium 30HGAL / Left-handedX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A
