Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Delphin CarbonIX 1000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.80 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.85 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight204g / 7.2oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €40.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.1/285
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X clearly outshines Delphin CarbonIX 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (86 centimeter / 33.86 inch). While Delphin CarbonIX 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Delphin CarbonIX?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- A line retrieve score of 8.1 out of 10 86 centimeter / 33.86 inch), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
Similar comparisons

Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara 1000 R vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara 1000 R


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
