Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
91.10 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight395g / 13.93oz
Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €199.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Twin Power FD
Spinning
76.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC3000XG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.25/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X edges out Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (8) and the gear ratio (4.9:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 220g / 7,76oz and a ergonomics of 6.27 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD and Shimano Twin Power FD?
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X
