Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 21 Presso LT
Spinning
78.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.55 out of 10
Ergonomics6.52 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight145g / 5115oz
Line retireve per crank61 centimeter / 24016 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €367.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000 S-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD offers a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch, while Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX stands out for a weight of 145g / 5115oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 21 Presso LT?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X vs Delphin SHARX 3000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 5000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
