Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD offers a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX stands out for a weight of 150g / 5,29oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Super lightweight thanks to its score and value 9 out of 10 (150g / 5,29oz), great reel for finesse fishing where comfort and control matter the most
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
