Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
88.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank72 centimeter / 28.35 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €668.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD offers a ball bearings of 4, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X stands out for a weight of 160g / 5,64oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X
- With a score like 8.93 out of 10 (160g / 5,64oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Complex XR C2000X


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Shimano Complex XR C2000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX
