Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €673.66
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD offers a ball bearings of 4, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX stands out for a weight of 175g / 6,17oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 FCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Shimano Catana FE 2500X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
