Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €649.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD offers a ball bearings of 4, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX stands out for a weight of 200g / 7,05oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 SX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin RAYA body vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2500SHGDX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano 19 Stella 10000 PGX
