Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €655.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD offers a ball bearings of 4, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX stands out for a weight of 200g / 7,05oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000DX
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Delphin REDIX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Delphin REDIX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX
