Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €729.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD offers a ball bearings of 4, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX stands out for a weight of 215g / 7,58oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX
- With a score like 8.57 out of 10 (215g / 7,58oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Delphin REDIX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
