Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €642.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizePC 2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD offers a ball bearings of 4, while Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX stands out for a weight of 170g / 6oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
- With a score like 8.87 out of 10 (170g / 6oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Delphin HORNET 20X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX
