Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Delphin ANTIGRAVITY
Spinning
47.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.7 out of 10
Ergonomics6.41 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight176g / 6.21oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings10+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/290
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). While Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Delphin ANTIGRAVITY?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX
