Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD edges out Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) and the ball bearings (4). Still, Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 5.3:1 and a durability of 5.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Penn Slammer IV?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Delphin BRONZ 6000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX


Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
