Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (4.7:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW-Right handX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Delphin REDIX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
