Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (4.7:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- With a maximum drag of 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), this reel offers excellent stopping power, giving fishermen the confidence to handle pressure situations with ease
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Torium 20PGAX


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X
