Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Cardiff XR
Spinning
77.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.48 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight155g / 5.47oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €219.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000S
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD offers a ball bearings of 4, while Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX stands out for a weight of 155g / 5,47oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Shimano Cardiff XR?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Delphin REDIX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500HGAX vs Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX
