Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Twin Power FE
Spinning
76.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.56 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.4:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings9+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €389.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000XGFE
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD edges out Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (4) and the gear ratio (4.7:1). Still, Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX holds its own with strengths like a weight of 215g / 7,58oz and a ergonomics of 6.28 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Shimano Twin Power FE?
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- The reel delivers balanced performance, suitable for most feeder and match situations without compromising too much on retrieve speed
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 21 TOURNAMENT FEEDER 25QD


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X
