Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD

Feeder And Match

87.30 out of 100

Value for money4.5 out of 5

Quality classExcellent

Durability5.5 out of 10

Ergonomics3.8 out of 10

Gear ratio4.7:1

Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs

Weight430g / 15.17oz

Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch

Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

BrandDAIWA
The main category of the reelFeeder and match
Price range~ €209.80
Is saltwater resistantNo
Spare spoolNo
Reel size-
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Shimano Ultegra

Spinning

92.50 out of 100

Value for money5 out of 5

Quality classGood

Durability8.5 out of 10

Ergonomics6.27 out of 10

Gear ratio5.8:1

Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs

Weight220g / 7.76oz

Line retireve per crank86 centimeter / 33.86 inch

Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

BrandSHIMANO
The main category of the reelSpinning
Price range~ €132.00
Is saltwater resistantYes
Spare spoolNo
Reel sizeC3000HGD
Handle typeSingle handle
Drag typeFront drag
Handle orientationLeft, Right
Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/130

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD offers a line retrieve per crank of 96 centimeter / 37.8 inch, while Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX stands out for a weight of 220g / 7,76oz. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD and Shimano Ultegra?

Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX

With a score like 8.53 out of 10 (220g / 7,76oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.