Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Airity LT
Spinning
91.80 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank67 centimeter / 26.38 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €250.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD
Feeder And Match
90.40 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.97 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €292.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3010
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.26/150
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX offers a ball bearings of 8, while Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Airity LT and Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD?
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX
- With an outstanding bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), the reel offers top tier smoothness. Ideal for anglers who appreciate premium feel
Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for feeder and match conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX
