Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Airity LT, 3000CXH, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10115-305
Daiwa 20 Airity LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings8

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €262.80
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000CXH
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 6000SS, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-605
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
62.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight390g / 13.76oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €75.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000SS
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX, offering significantly better performance in weight (195g / 6,88oz) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Airity LT and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables