Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Airity LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.35 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight195g / 6.88oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €262.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Airity LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 Airity LT 3000CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano Talica II 10IIX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Tekota 501 HGA / Left-handedX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X
