Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
89.90 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €210.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT
Spinning
84.20 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.6 out of 10
Ergonomics6.45 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight165g / 5.82oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €180.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX offers a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, while Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT and Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT?
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 2500DX
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.71 out of 10 (75 centimeter / 29.53 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano Aero C3000X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX
