Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
90.80 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €226.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
Spinning
51.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.7 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.5:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank95 centimeter / 37.4 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.3/270
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX clearly outshines Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT and Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF?
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X
