Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
90.80 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €226.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Daiwa Freams LT
Spinning
73.20 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag-
Weight330g / 11.64oz
Line retireve per crank101 centimeter / 39.76 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €120.20
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000D-H
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.43/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX edges out Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the weight (175g / 6,17oz). Still, Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 5 and a line retrieve per crank of 101 centimeter / 39.76 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT and Daiwa Freams LT?
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X


Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Delphin MonoDRAG 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX
