Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €226.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000D-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX clearly outshines Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX, offering significantly better performance in gear ratio (6.2:1) and weight (175g / 6,17oz). While Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa BG 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX
