Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
91.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €234.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)
Spinning
78.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €151.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000D
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX edges out Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and the line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). Still, Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a durability of 8.5 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT and Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ)?
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Abu GARCIA Revo MGX 20 SP/LX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT5000-CX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX
