Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
91.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €234.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and line retrieve per crank (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch). While Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin ELIXIR 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500X


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Daiwa RX LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX
