Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
91.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €234.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and gear ratio (5.2:1). While Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX
