Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT
Spinning
91.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €234.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000D-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/150

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
50.20 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.82 out of 10
Ergonomics6.27 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight220g / 7.76oz
Line retireve per crank66 centimeter / 25.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €39.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/140
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX clearly outshines Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and total score (9.1 out of 10). While Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX
