Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT , 4000-C, 4000-C, Spinning Angelrolle, Frontbremse, 10186-400
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT
Spinning
60.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €42.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000-C
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT, 6000SS, left and right hand, Match And Feeder Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10217-605
Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT
Feeder And Match
62.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.62 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight390g / 13.76oz
Line retireve per crank92 centimeter / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelFeeder and match
  • Price range~ €75.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size6000SS
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Conclusion

Both Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX offers a weight of 290g / 10,23oz, while Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT and Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT?

There are not much differences between the two comparables