Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT
Spinning
60.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.87 out of 10
Ergonomics6.03 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight290g / 10.23oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa GS LTD 4000X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Beastmaster vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X vs Shimano Beastmaster


Shimano Beastmaster vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX
