Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
57.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €69.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
50.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.13 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag4 kg
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.28mm/220m
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X offers a ball bearings of 6, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 82cm / 32.28 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 2000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000 HGX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX vs Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX
