Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
72.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.32 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight205g / 7.23oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter / 34.25 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €71.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500-XH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa BG 8000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Talica II 12IIAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 24 SALTIGA L


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Talica II 12IIAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X
