Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Abu GARCIA Zenon
Spinning
83.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.47 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag5.2kg / 11,46lbs
Weight160g / 5.64oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings11
Technical Specifications
- BrandABU GARCIA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €326.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 SH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.33/150
Conclusion
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX edges out Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). Still, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Abu GARCIA Zenon?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Abu GARCIA Zenon 4000 SHX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Delphin HORNET 20X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX


Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Delphin HORNET 20X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa Crossfire LT 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500DX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX
