Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs) and the gear ratio (5.3:1). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 M HGX


Daiwa Tanacom 500 vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Talica II 16IIAX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2500X vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa Tanacom 500


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
