Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
72.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
84.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.5 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag5kg / 11.02lbs
Weight150g / 5.29oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings12
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €635.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000D-P
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX edges out Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (9.5 out of 10) and the total score (8.44 out of 10). Still, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a line retrieve per crank of 93 centimeter / 36.61 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX
- 8.8 out of 10 (93 centimeter / 36.61 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Delphin CarbonIX 1000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500X


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Delphin CarbonIX 2000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X
