Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
72.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.28 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight215g / 7.58oz
Line retireve per crank93 centimeter / 36.61 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €72.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX edges out Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX with slightly better overall performance, especially on the gear ratio (6.2:1) and the maximum drag (10kg / 22,05lbs). Still, Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX holds its own with strengths like a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a great drag score 9.6 out of 10 (10kg / 22,05lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 5000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Catana FE 1000X


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Catana FE 1000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X
