Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Shimano Complex XR 2500X


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI


Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500FJX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000DX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Complex XR 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX
