Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
