Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
60.00 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CP
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX and Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX offers a maximum drag of 12kg / 26,46lbs, while Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CPX
- The 5 out of 10 (4.8:1) gear ratio gives you the power you need to handle heavy lures and strong large fish out of cover
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Shimano Torium 30PGAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa TANACOM 1200X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Torium 30PGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 IIX


Shimano Vanquish FC 4000XGCX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Delphin INKS 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
