Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa TANACOM 800X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa TANACOM
Multireels
72.40 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.71 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1910g / 67.37oz
Line retireve per crank59 centimeter / 23.23 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €595.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size800
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/800
Conclusion
Both Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX and Daiwa TANACOM 800X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX offers a gear ratio of 5.2:1, while Daiwa TANACOM 800X stands out for a durability of 5.71 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Daiwa TANACOM?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.43 out of 10 (235g / 8,29oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 30 II


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 HGFJX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Sahara 3000 SS DH HG R vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 2500 RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Torium 14HGA / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
