Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT
Spinning
66.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.22 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight235g / 8.29oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €74.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
45.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank68cm / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.20mm/140m
Conclusion
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa 20 Fuego LT and Daiwa Sweepfire E 1500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- 6.71 out of 10 (82 centimeter / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500AX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Penn Battle III 6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 3000X


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Delphin BRONZ 5000X


Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X
